PDA

View Full Version : S45i: lost number association


ElPossa
12-27-2004, 14:00
Hi, this is my first post :rolleyes: so, don't hurt me!
I've a problem with my s45v28 -> s45iv4: if I have a phone number written in a SMS that I have stored in addresssbook (or SIM phonebook), it was previously (with s45v28) decoded into the correct Name's number owner. It doesn't work with my new wonderful S45iv4 ... :( Someone can help me?
Thnks

lalo.lerry
12-27-2004, 15:11
Missing Association between number and name when reading a SMS is one of the 2 missing thing in S45i fw.
And nooone has already made a patch to correct it.
BTW, have you find the second missing thing? :D

ElPossa
12-27-2004, 15:49
Not yet. It's a little bit strange to speak with other italian people in english ... it's funny :cool:
But it's very cool the loudspeaker shortcut while talking with left-softkey, as the play-of-recorder (w/ loudspeaker).
I have already improved FlexMem to 393 kB (it's the first patch). Next patches ... temperature, name of the day/month instead of traditional format, and association w/ icons for different numbers on the profile -I've never used profiles just for this reason, I don't know if someone calls me from home, mobile 1, mobile 2...-

How can I try to find out it?
:confused:

ElPossa

lalo.lerry
12-27-2004, 22:58
Use "Show caller icon v0.6" patch ;)

fcotrina
01-04-2005, 17:39
I think the second missing thing is the 'Private note'. In S45v21, you can encript your notes so that the phonecode is required to read them again.
On the other hand, this means to flag the first byte of the Note from 00 to 01. But the note, in cleartext, is still ther so that anyone with access to the phone and a data cable can read it.
The bad thing is that changing 00 to 01 in S45iv4 has no effect. Therefore the only way to encript your notes would be to use a patch.

lalo.lerry
01-04-2005, 23:57
Exactly!
"Private note" is missing.
I don't consider it a great problem, otherwise I'll already tried to make a patch.
More disturbing is first missing thing, lack of number-name association, IMHO.