FAM v3 i ICD v2.2 - GSM-Forum

GoLL@B · 11-02-2005, 12:55

I found next problem. When I have ICD v2.2 and FAMv3 my phone turns off when someone calls me. I suppose this is problem with ICD. I must have it for Fam v3. I don`t want to apply FAM 2.1 again because I haven`t had any problems since I uninstalled FAM 2.1.

Can someone help me?

cyperghost · 11-02-2005, 12:57

Well Rst7 can modify ICD to be compatible with FAM3

Rst7 · 11-02-2005, 14:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoLL@B

I found next problem. When I have ICD v2.2 and FAMv3 my phone turns off when someone calls me. I suppose this is problem with ICD. I must have it for Fam v3. I don`t want to apply FAM 2.1 again because I haven`t had any problems since I uninstalled FAM 2.1.

Can someone help me?

Try to apply this above ICD v2.2 - don't undo ICD!

Code:

;
; ICD v2.2/FAM3 Patch2Patch (C)2005 by Rst7/CBSIE
;
0x4456E6: E6F5E400E6F48257DAE4F07F E6FDE400E6FC8257DAE4FC7F

GoLL@B · 11-03-2005, 13:02

Ok It works great. Thanks.

cyperghost · 11-03-2005, 19:42

Thank you very much Rst7

Can you explain, how we must change registers to access to FAM3?

Rst7 · 11-04-2005, 08:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyperghost

Thank you very much Rst7

Can you explain, how we must change registers to access to FAM3?

When use FAM2: For call routine in filesystem context u make a call 0E47FF0 with address of your routine in R4:R5.

When use FAM3.2: For call routine in filesystem context u make a call 0E47FFC with address of your routine in R12:R13. Additional parameters to your routine can be passed throws R14:R15 (when u call 0E47FFC) -> R12:R13 (when filesystem process call your routine) - BFA22 use this feature to pass adress of bin filename without global variable usage.

But if patch use other address in FAM2 (not E47FF0) or not use FAM2 at all - u need rewrite all file access

cyperghost · 11-04-2005, 13:48

Ah okay I understand. That's the reason why you your "correction" to ICD is such a few bytes.

I compared "Incoming Detail Record" Patch original vs yours...
There were 50 or more bytes changed... Does this mean "CDR" used annother method to acess files?

Rst7 · 11-04-2005, 13:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyperghost

Ah okay I understand. That's the reason why you your "correction" to ICD is such a few bytes.

I compared "Incoming Detail Record" Patch original vs yours...
There were 50 or more bytes changed... Does this mean "CDR" used annother method to acess files?

Not another method to access files - another method to execute CDR-own routine in filesystem's context. So CDR - ~50 bytes, ICD - 4 bytes (two register and offset in call statement) patched.

Charger · 11-04-2005, 14:19

Filesystem access method used by Riza in cdr (like dummy file creation and other) causes this 50 bytes difference

11-02-2005, 12:55	#1 (permalink)
GoLL@B Freak Poster Join Date: May 2005 Location: Somewhere in Poland Age: 36 Posts: 266 Member: 143475 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 0	FAM v3 i ICD v2.2 I found next problem. When I have ICD v2.2 and FAMv3 my phone turns off when someone calls me. I suppose this is problem with ICD. I must have it for Fam v3. I don`t want to apply FAM 2.1 again because I haven`t had any problems since I uninstalled FAM 2.1. Can someone help me?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ICD v2.2 small question	charlielao	Siemens-Benq Flash Patching	12	03-14-2005 11:00

11-02-2005, 12:57	#2 (permalink)
cyperghost No Life Poster Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 705 Member: 42457 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1	Well Rst7 can modify ICD to be compatible with FAM3

11-03-2005, 13:02	#4 (permalink)
GoLL@B Freak Poster Join Date: May 2005 Location: Somewhere in Poland Age: 36 Posts: 266 Member: 143475 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 0	Ok It works great. Thanks.

11-03-2005, 19:42	#5 (permalink)
cyperghost No Life Poster Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 705 Member: 42457 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1	Thank you very much Rst7 Can you explain, how we must change registers to access to FAM3?

11-04-2005, 13:48	#7 (permalink)
cyperghost No Life Poster Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 705 Member: 42457 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1	Ah okay I understand. That's the reason why you your "correction" to ICD is such a few bytes. I compared "Incoming Detail Record" Patch original vs yours... There were 50 or more bytes changed... Does this mean "CDR" used annother method to acess files?

11-04-2005, 14:19	#9 (permalink)
Charger Major Poster Join Date: Aug 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 45 Member: 79973 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 0	Filesystem access method used by Riza in cdr (like dummy file creation and other) causes this 50 bytes difference