GSM Shop GSM Shop
GSM-Forum  

Welcome to the GSM-Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
Only registered members may post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 8 million posts.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please - Click to REGISTER!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us .

Go Back   GSM-Forum > Non GSM/Mobile Related Forums > Off Topic Zone


Off Topic Zone Here all other messages...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2008, 16:14   #1 (permalink)
Freak Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 110
Member: 69358
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 21
Best mobile for Signal reception


I have a friend who lives in a poor network coverage area and always have reception problem. what is best mobile for signal reception? Or All mobiles have same level of signal reception?

btw, he is using samsung e370.

Thanks

donish
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 16:19   #2 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
.::Skylinks::.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pakistan
Age: 36
Posts: 1,911
Member: 300354
Status: Offline
Sonork: 100.1577485
Thanks Meter: 760
Samsung is Always poor in (Reception)... Better to change Phone brand...! I suggest to Get some phone of Nokia
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to .::Skylinks::. For This Useful Post:
Old 07-20-2008, 17:03   #3 (permalink)
Freak Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 110
Member: 69358
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 21
Some say Motorola is good at reception as well. Is it true?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 18:05   #4 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
The SAINT®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: GSM world
Age: 49
Posts: 3,575
Member: 111249
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 531
I think receptionwise, Nokia is the best. I have used almost all brands but m really satisfied with Nokia phones.

BR
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 18:13   #5 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
CPUKILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 966
Member: 76257
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 77
Siemens Are Best In Reception,second Comes Nokia The Simpler Models Like 1100,1110types,3rd Comes Motorola,then Sony Ericsson And Its More Likely According To The Kind Of Towers Used By Service Providers --regards-cpukiller
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 07:05   #6 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
.::Skylinks::.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pakistan
Age: 36
Posts: 1,911
Member: 300354
Status: Offline
Sonork: 100.1577485
Thanks Meter: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by donish View Post
Some say Motorola is good at reception as well. Is it true?
If you are talking about old Moto baseband phones then i agree But if you are saying that new Dualband Moto can give you Good Reception Then you are wrong bro...

sorry to say but cheapest Sagem phones are good enough in Reception then Motorola!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 07:17   #7 (permalink)
Freak Poster
 
SMDSAFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MARS
Posts: 379
Member: 311990
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 146
reception

hai friend i think the nokia n70,n73,sony ericsson k700,k800,motorola l6,l7 have good network.
Quote:
Originally Posted by donish View Post
I have a friend who lives in a poor network coverage area and always have reception problem. what is best mobile for signal reception? Or All mobiles have same level of signal reception?

btw, he is using samsung e370.

Thanks

donish
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 00:14   #8 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
Stylo_GSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK, London
Age: 35
Posts: 2,236
Member: 177235
Status: Offline
Sonork: 111568
Thanks Meter: 138
Nokia 6310i?
E50?
E51?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 00:39   #9 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Age: 40
Posts: 898
Member: 807542
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 194
nokia 6310i is best and alcatel too
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to universalunlocking For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2008, 05:37   #10 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Age: 38
Posts: 1,311
Member: 547967
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 653
nokia 6310i having good service
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 05:49   #11 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
CONCORDIA GSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Roof of the world
Posts: 3,580
Member: 209722
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 818
6310 is too oldy his natural life over now.
E51 is the best for now.
I have it already.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 06:08   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
zakirn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: close to your mind
Age: 53
Posts: 572
Member: 7457
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 21
overalll siemens is best for network bad for battery
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 14:06   #13 (permalink)
No Life Poster
 
gul_hassan528's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: RWP Pakistan
Posts: 1,257
Member: 420821
Status: Offline
Sonork: 100.1603493
Thanks Meter: 731
yes e50 is best....................
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 16:51   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Member: 1020634
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 1
king of mobiles 3310 my dear
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ashfaque84 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6210 without signal reception (always mailbox) celo Nokia Legacy Phones ( DCT-1 ,2 ,3 ,L ) 1 10-29-2002 23:26


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08.



Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
- GSM Hosting Ltd. - 1999-2023 -
Page generated in 0.31187 seconds with 9 queries

SEO by vBSEO