Some improvements on SLAP

[audi_tt]

Hi. Respecting your work on SLAP Mr. Lavarow. I still would like to ask/suggest for SLAP some improvements:

1) More statistics about calculated codes like: mastercode, time ended, time elapsed, progress in % of range in which code was found, etc.

2) More customized scan: linear downward, scan from middle like (50-60% then 40-50%, 60-70%, 30-40% and so on). Also would be very cool to let user choose ranges and their scanning order.

3) Maybe possible to collect info from all successfully scanned phones and make some database online? Then would be very cool to see in which ranges mostly correct codes found or how much where odd or even mastercodes or some other statistical info. This way we all could improve SLAP algorithm.

Hope this info would be useful for you.

regards

[makac999]

I Agree with you. Anyway, all of the functions that are possible in oclHashcat in short.

BR

[hugmax]

It is pretty much random... after I analyzed a lot of data... so: just luck.

waiting for more data, but so far... it is random.

[audi_tt]

Originally Posted by hugmax

It is pretty much random... after I analyzed a lot of data... so: just luck.

waiting for more data, but so far... it is random.

Yes, pretty much random. But if we could find even smallest regularity then we could shorten calc time for 2 or more times. I don't know what is lot of data for you but if Mr. Lavarow could collect data from all his customers online then I think would be really big data. Having such data would be possible to analyze for everybody. 1 man is too little for analysing big data but few hundreds people I think can find something interesting. That's the purpose of forum.

regards

[hugmax]

7k, imei+hash+Master code, thats not as much as I want... but it is random. you can be lucky choosing the numbers... but it is just that: luck.

[audi_tt]

Originally Posted by hugmax

7k, imei+hash+Master code, thats not as much as I want... but it is random. you can be lucky choosing the numbers... but it is just that: luck.

Even if it's fully random: if 3 times in a row I find code in 20-50%, then 4th time I would start from 100% downwards because statistically it must be in range 50-100%.

[gearry]

yesterday x6 95% today 3720 39%.. its brutal force very ungratefull for statistical analysis

[hugmax]

Originally Posted by audi_tt

Even if it's fully random: if 3 times in a row I find code in 20-50%, then 4th time I would start from 100% downwards because statistically it must be in range 50-100%.

random means, that you can be lucky and get 5 codes in the 50-90% range but then you will get 1 at 17% or and the other at 95%

[audi_tt]

Originally Posted by hugmax

random means, that you can be lucky and get 5 codes in the 50-90% range but then you will get 1 at 17% or and the other at 95%

I know what means random. But I see you don't know what is statistical theory. Even if events are independent (as rolling the dice) but distribution is equal you still can calculate probability. That means: if 3 times in a row I find code in 0-50%, then 4th time there is very big chance to get code in 50-100% and it is much bigger than getting in 0-50%. This probability is possible to calculate BTW.

regards

T.

[makac999]

i found one at 2% yesterday another one at 7% today... but also few on 80-90%

BR

[spherus]

Personally, I dont like "random" things in my system.
So i preffer linear calculation. With resume-start in "selected point".
Randomization can give You up to 50% more chance in mach.
But when things went wrong (process interupted)
You have to start from begining. (coz 75% of random bul$hit)

Unless "randomisation" of salts is linear aswell...
(1,9,2,8,3,7,4,6,5.....)

Take it as you want, I depend on linear and NEVER failed me.
I allways know where to start calculation from.

After 20 calculafions smart mind could get first vectors..

Br
Spherus Hagroo

[audi_tt]

Originally Posted by spherus

Personally, I dont like "random" things in my system.
So i preffer linear calculation. With resume-start in "selected point".
Randomization can give You up to 50% more chance in mach.
But when things went wrong (process interupted)
You have to start from begining. (coz 75% of random bul$hit)

Unless "randomisation" of salts is linear aswell...
(1,9,2,8,3,7,4,6,5.....)

Take it as you want, I depend on linear and NEVER failed me.
I allways know where to start calculation from.

After 20 calculafions smart mind could get first vectors..

Br
Spherus Hagroo

I suppose you're using not Fenix key sw for LBF, right?

[spherus]

Originally Posted by audi_tt

I suppose you're using not Fenix key sw for LBF, right?

sometimes I use Fenix - easy que-ing
but I am useing all possibilities what are avilable:
own LBF
MT-box server
BEST server
Network codes (in C3-00, X2-00)
etc, etc,