GSM Shop GSM Shop
GSM-Forum  

Welcome to the GSM-Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
Only registered members may post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 8 million posts.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please - Click to REGISTER!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us .

Go Back   GSM-Forum > Product Support Sections > No More Supported Solutions (Dead Products) > No More Supported H/W Products > HDBox


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2020, 15:58   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: San Martin
Posts: 1
Member: 2960843
Status: Offline
Thanks Meter: 0
Chromebook ID List Outdated


HDBox is quite a great product, and I've been using it to unlock quite a few chromebooks (particularly the Samsung XE303 variant(s))

However, I encountered a major issue; the chromebook unlocking software checks the chip id before reading or writing, but does not have a proper or complete list of flashchips used by manufacturers, found in google's flashchips.h.

As such, the chromebooks with winbond chips (again, specifically of the XE303 variant) work with HDBox, while the same model of chromebooks with chips from gigadevice fail to be recognized.

The winbond chips show up as
Code:
00 EF 60 16 (W25Q32DV - 4 MB)
, shown on line 966 of flashchips.h but gigadevice chips show up as
Code:
00 C8 60 16  (UNKNOWN ID)
when it exists on line 398 of flashchips.h

It would be immensely helpful to create a way where users can upload/use their own lists of recognized IDs for chips so that this issue wouldn't occur. As seen above, even their architectures and sizes
Code:
60 16
are the same; in theory, even if the image from the winbond chip were directly copied to the gigadevice chip, the functionality of the chromebook would be fine.

Please consider removing the ID check or just checking if it's
Code:
00 00 00 00
(disconnected) or the ids in line 33-37 of flashchips.h (dummy chips and null ids).

Note: I was unable to include links in this post due to the unnecessary restrictions; please ask if you need to see the link to flashchips.h
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:00.



Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
- GSM Hosting Ltd. - 1999-2023 -
Page generated in 0.14347 seconds with 8 queries

SEO by vBSEO