|
Welcome to the GSM-Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Only registered members may post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 8 million posts. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please - Click to REGISTER! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us . |
|
Register | FAQ | Donate | Forum Rules | Root any Device | ★iPhone Unlock★ | ★ Direct Codes ★ | Direct Unlock Source |
View Poll Results: MT-Box Pro VS U'ID-BOX which is better | |||
MT-Box Pro | 243 | 63.12% | |
U'ID-BOX | 142 | 36.88% | |
Voters: 385. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2008, 20:13 | #91 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Sofia Age: 43
Posts: 1,541
Member: 77941 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 120 | BR |
11-06-2008, 15:40 | #93 (permalink) | |
No Life Poster Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ukraine Age: 44
Posts: 2,727
Member: 75408 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1,190 | Quote:
I say more - UID was first box that can unlock phone with any code counter (even 3/3 10/10). | |
01-04-2009, 16:05 | #95 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London
Posts: 1,307
Member: 722656 Status: Offline Sonork: 100.1584918 Thanks Meter: 294 | well mt is not bad, but you have to have another box with it. it is not a full solution or you have to pay for unlocking of some of the very basic phones like 2630 and others. sometime you need to flash phone with jaf if it is not done with mt or if any thing goes wrong, which is not a good point for them. |
Bookmarks |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ve pro vs xientel box | shehryar mardan | VE-PRO BOX | 4 | 11-18-2009 18:04 |
MT-Box Pro VS U'ID-BOX | lxa786 | UID - Box | 0 | 09-02-2007 19:48 |
POLL Dejan Box -- MT-PRO -- U'ID BOX | mobilelatham | Nokia Base Band 5 ( BB-5 ) | 6 | 08-02-2007 22:02 |
|