All Users, Vote for Alternative Options In CM2MTK Module - GSM-Forum

Kwesi_Roy_GH · 10-25-2016, 14:10

Hi to all users, with reference to http://forum.gsmhosting.com/vbb/f296...ution-2148036/, I will urge and entreat every user to vote for Alternative Options in tool instead.

Instead of choosing from these options
V1:
It little bit tricky, can not work on some phones.
But it allow cover near 60% of existing MTK secured phones. After unsecure device can be fladhed, repaired and etc. without need of factory signed firmware. Can be fastly copypasted by crappycano and rest idiots.

Or

V2 :
need wait some time, until we finish factory sign method. But it will require upload FW's on our server for signing. Can't be copypasted,

Rather vote to Available alternative Options of either performing operation in Signed Mode or Unsigned mode according to choice of preference in which these options should be made available in the new cm2mtk module. In this case user would be left to decide performing operation in either Signed mode or unsigned mode in the tool.

Please if you agree with me, vote for this option instead. Thanks

View Poll Results: Alternative Options in CM2MTK Module or Not
Alternative Options in CM2MTK Module	19	90.48%
No Alternative Options necessary	2	9.52%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

10-25-2016, 14:10	#1 (permalink)
Kwesi_Roy_GH No Life Poster Join Date: May 2016 Location: Madina, Accra, GHANA Posts: 1,181 Member: 2575234 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1,134	All Users, Vote for Alternative Options In CM2MTK Module Hi to all users, with reference to http://forum.gsmhosting.com/vbb/f296...ution-2148036/, I will urge and entreat every user to vote for Alternative Options in tool instead. Instead of choosing from these options V1: It little bit tricky, can not work on some phones. But it allow cover near 60% of existing MTK secured phones. After unsecure device can be fladhed, repaired and etc. without need of factory signed firmware. Can be fastly copypasted by crappycano and rest idiots. Or V2 : need wait some time, until we finish factory sign method. But it will require upload FW's on our server for signing. Can't be copypasted, Rather vote to Available alternative Options of either performing operation in Signed Mode or Unsigned mode according to choice of preference in which these options should be made available in the new cm2mtk module. In this case user would be left to decide performing operation in either Signed mode or unsigned mode in the tool. Please if you agree with me, vote for this option instead. Thanks Last edited by Kwesi_Roy_GH; 10-25-2016 at 14:18.