|
Welcome to the GSM-Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Only registered members may post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 8 million posts. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please - Click to REGISTER! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us . |
|
Register | FAQ | Donate | Forum Rules | Root any Device | ★iPhone Unlock★ | ★ Direct Codes ★ | Direct Unlock Source | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Alternative Options in CM2MTK Module or Not | |||
Alternative Options in CM2MTK Module | 19 | 90.48% | |
No Alternative Options necessary | 2 | 9.52% | |
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-25-2016, 14:10 | #1 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: May 2016 Location: Madina, Accra, GHANA
Posts: 1,181
Member: 2575234 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1,134 | All Users, Vote for Alternative Options In CM2MTK Module Instead of choosing from these options V1: It little bit tricky, can not work on some phones. But it allow cover near 60% of existing MTK secured phones. After unsecure device can be fladhed, repaired and etc. without need of factory signed firmware. Can be fastly copypasted by crappycano and rest idiots. Or V2 : need wait some time, until we finish factory sign method. But it will require upload FW's on our server for signing. Can't be copypasted, Rather vote to Available alternative Options of either performing operation in Signed Mode or Unsigned mode according to choice of preference in which these options should be made available in the new cm2mtk module. In this case user would be left to decide performing operation in either Signed mode or unsigned mode in the tool. Please if you agree with me, vote for this option instead. Thanks Last edited by Kwesi_Roy_GH; 10-25-2016 at 14:18. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kwesi_Roy_GH For This Useful Post: |
10-26-2016, 07:33 | #4 (permalink) |
Insane Poster Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: nepal
Posts: 91
Member: 2544709 Status: Offline Sonork: shivapradhan0 Thanks Meter: 25 | Yes v2 system is good and secure..but uploading (fw) to server for sign is bad....for slow internet connection users impossible....better think more..... V1 is fast and reliable...but unsecure |
10-26-2016, 08:56 | #5 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: May 2016 Location: Madina, Accra, GHANA
Posts: 1,181
Member: 2575234 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1,134 | Guys, if you are reading carefully, I'm not asking anybody to vote for V1 or V2. What I'm asking you to do is to vote for Alternative Options which implies that you will have both V1 and V2 options in one tool so that when you launch the tool, you would have the options to perform operation in either of the two i.e. signed or unsigned mode. Thanks |
10-26-2016, 09:26 | #6 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: In my LAB
Posts: 3,163
Member: 231728 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 2,105 | i have propose this in my post : http://forum.gsmhosting.com/vbb/12120040-post21.html |
10-26-2016, 11:46 | #7 (permalink) | |
No Life Poster Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Uganda Age: 45
Posts: 2,923
Member: 96478 Status: Offline Sonork: 100.1674604 Thanks Meter: 1,421 | Quote:
What Kindness is this ?? [just kidding] | |
10-26-2016, 12:21 | #8 (permalink) |
No Life Poster Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Lahore Age: 38
Posts: 868
Member: 1016490 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 290 | If selection is must in V1 and V2. Then my vote goes to V1. But i agree with you. This option is not must for us. We are already doing secured phones with little tricks and with other free tools. If team work on other module especially on Qualcom to add other options and add other CPU's. That is more necessary for us. Best of luck. Thx |
10-26-2016, 12:21 | #9 (permalink) | |
No Life Poster Join Date: May 2016 Location: Madina, Accra, GHANA
Posts: 1,181
Member: 2575234 Status: Offline Thanks Meter: 1,134 | Quote:
competitor with regards to the usage of the tool but for product designer, yes, he does have a competitor and that's not to say that designer should be afraid of competition and fail to publicise his work to his users because there is always 'World first', quality and reliability and people will always go for the best and leading program as people are already going for CM2 because is the best and reliable. Please vote wisely. | |
Bookmarks |
| |
|